- Joined
- Dec 30, 2019
- Messages
- 11,681
- Age
- 25
- Location
- Has Left The Forums
- Website
- everafterentertainment.carrd.co
- Credits
- 5,124
There was this scandal maybe a month ago regarding this topic and I just now remembered it after watching a different video where it was mentioned.
Basically, there is this youtuber named Jaeguchi who makes color-coded lyric videos for kpop songs. They are published nearly the same time that the song is released and they have 3.5 million subscribers. They started getting into trouble when another youtuber revealed that they were making money off of these videos, when they shouldn't.
If you don't know YouTube's monetization rules: You cannot be paid for a video if you use more than 5 or so seconds of copyrighted content (songs). That's why some content you might watch will have the pitch altered or some other change so they don't get a copyright strike and demonetized.
Youtubers who have a lot of subscribers are able to make some money by outside sponsors, which is why a random song might play at the end of a lyric video.
It turns out that Jaeguchi's videos were somehow monetized, idk how, and were making a lot of money because of how many views they get.
People started getting really mad because they viewed it as Jaeguchi, and similar youtubers, stealing money from the kpop artists themselves. The whole situation has quieted down at this point.
Here is my point of view: As someone who makes color coded lyric videos and line distribution videos, I know how much time and effort goes into actually making them. It can take me several hours to make a lyric video, and even longer for a line distribution video. Which is what makes me believe that youtubers who make this type of content should be monetized. Yes, they do have copyrighted material in their videos, but what they are making is original content in my eyes. To me it is the same as when fans sell kpop merchandise that they made themselves. It has the likeness of the idol on it and names, which are sometimes even copyrighted (YG...).
I do understand that other people could see this as them stealing, but with a lot of these companies they have a ton of money, so it's not like they're going to go bankrupt because of a lyric video. With smaller companies there is a difference though. If there was a way to only monetize videos from companies that make a certain amount every year, I would prefer that. But overall, I think if the content is original and transformative, then they should be monetized.
Please don't hate for having this view, it's solely based on my experience. If I didn't make these videos, I would probably think differently.
Do you have an opinion on the topic?
Basically, there is this youtuber named Jaeguchi who makes color-coded lyric videos for kpop songs. They are published nearly the same time that the song is released and they have 3.5 million subscribers. They started getting into trouble when another youtuber revealed that they were making money off of these videos, when they shouldn't.
If you don't know YouTube's monetization rules: You cannot be paid for a video if you use more than 5 or so seconds of copyrighted content (songs). That's why some content you might watch will have the pitch altered or some other change so they don't get a copyright strike and demonetized.
Youtubers who have a lot of subscribers are able to make some money by outside sponsors, which is why a random song might play at the end of a lyric video.
It turns out that Jaeguchi's videos were somehow monetized, idk how, and were making a lot of money because of how many views they get.
People started getting really mad because they viewed it as Jaeguchi, and similar youtubers, stealing money from the kpop artists themselves. The whole situation has quieted down at this point.
Here is my point of view: As someone who makes color coded lyric videos and line distribution videos, I know how much time and effort goes into actually making them. It can take me several hours to make a lyric video, and even longer for a line distribution video. Which is what makes me believe that youtubers who make this type of content should be monetized. Yes, they do have copyrighted material in their videos, but what they are making is original content in my eyes. To me it is the same as when fans sell kpop merchandise that they made themselves. It has the likeness of the idol on it and names, which are sometimes even copyrighted (YG...).
I do understand that other people could see this as them stealing, but with a lot of these companies they have a ton of money, so it's not like they're going to go bankrupt because of a lyric video. With smaller companies there is a difference though. If there was a way to only monetize videos from companies that make a certain amount every year, I would prefer that. But overall, I think if the content is original and transformative, then they should be monetized.
Please don't hate for having this view, it's solely based on my experience. If I didn't make these videos, I would probably think differently.
Do you have an opinion on the topic?